April 13, 2015
For five decades, an architectural marvel reminiscent of a UFO saucer has beckoned tourists and commuters alike in the heart of Philadelphia, all the while lingering at the bottom of City Hall like one of William Penn's lost frisbees.
From a design standpoint, it's a piece of midcentury modern architecture.
"'Midcentury modern' is a term that's exactly what it sounds like: architecture designed and built in the ‘40s, '50s and ‘60s, that tends to have a sort of stylistic sleekness -- a time with windows and sin divisions and a very sleek, 'Jetsons' quality to the architecture," says Katherine Dowdell, an assistant professor of architecture at Drexel University. "There’s an architectural pedigree to this building that’s important. It's a classic example of what people were thinking about in ’62, and if someone asked, ‘How do you define midcentury modern?’ I’d show them this building."
A photograph taken at dusk shortly after the building opened in 1964. Lawrence S. Williams Collection, Athenaeum of Philadelphia / PhillyVoice
Grossi, who's accumulated 268 petition signatures so far and launched a "#SavetheSaucer" social media campaign in tandem with Young Friends of the Preservation Alliance, says midcentury pieces are just now starting to enter the annals of discussion in the preservation world, making the fight to retain the saucer an especially significant and of-the-moment one.
“We’re in an interesting moment for a building like the saucer, because the preservation community has recently rallied around midcentury modern design," Grossi says. "[The saucer] would certainly be eligible [for historic places registry], if there was an effort toward designating it -- it would be a viable candidate. But I don’t know if that’s the play right now."
The play right now is merely to sway the city and design firm to repurpose the building -- a fight the Preservation Alliance appears to be alone in. The Fairmount Park Conservancy told PhillyVoice.com that, as of now, it supports Hargreaves' and the city's plans for redesign. Of note, however, is that the Preservation Alliance's fight isn't against the possible renovations (which are welcomed, in fact), but the demolition.
One concern Grossi offered about starting from scratch is that any replacement building may end up mimicking the saucer anyway, because of space limitations. In which case, the building just needs a makeover, after years of being poorly maintained and losing its signature translucence.
"I wouldn’t be surprised if the [new] building looked a
bit like the saucer, with a lot of glass and light. It’s hard to appreciate [the saucer] now, because it’s covered in banners, and the glazing prevents you from seeing
in the building, where there’s lots of beautiful tile," Rossi says. "It’s a matter of bringing this back to its former glory, and using the space in a valuable way – and a way
that will bring in revenue, which is something they’re particularly sensitive
“Whether or not we renovate or replace it, the programming will be the same: a visitor-center function with info about amenities and attractions and some staff offices for maintenance and security," Mark Focht, first deputy commissioner for Philadelphia Parks and Recreation, told PhillyVoice.com. "What we’d be adding is public restrooms that would be accessible to the public, and a significant food and beverage operation. We’re talking to a number of operators that run food and beverage businesses, but we do want something beyond the food trucks – though, they will remain, just not in the current location."
Focht suggests that "food and beverage" operation will likely not be a coffee shop, as some have speculated. Because, frankly, there are plenty of other options in the vicinity for coffee -- including a Starbucks right across the street.
He also clarifies that the saucer shown in the plans (below) is meant to be a placeholder, confirming it's not any kind of indication that the saucer will stay, and that a possible new structure may not follow that circular blueprint.
“A round building can be hard for any functioning, and we may find that renovation costs are expensive or exceed new construction, and those are all things we’re considering," Focht said. "Keeping [the saucer] would be environmentally sustainable, certainly, but there’s lots of other factors too."
What will unquestionably stay the same is the saucer's location: Because of how LOVE Park (created four years after the saucer) and surrounding development was thought-out in the 1960s (particularly, the subway concourse and underground parking), the southwest corner of the park is the only section that can safely hold a building. So, whatever happens, the location will likely be the same and comparable to the 4,854 square feet of space (counting both floors) the saucer currently boasts.
As for the preservation efforts, Focht merely said he's heard the arguments for preservation, and that it's "a factor we're considering."
Until then, enjoy gawking at that flying-saucer work of art while you can. Because all it will take is an eraser nub to a schematics sheet to forever wipe it from Philly's future.