March 24, 2017
Pat Toomey, the U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, was one of 50 Republicans voting Thursday to roll back the Federal Communications Commission's landmark broadband privacy rules for internet service providers.
The action is the first step toward allowing internet providers such as Comcast, AT&T and Verizon to sell your browsing habits and other personal information as they expand their own online ad businesses.
Those Obama-era rules, not yet in effect, would have required internet providers to ask your permission before sharing your personal information. That's a much stronger privacy-protection weapon than letting them use your data until you tell them to stop. As anyone who has ever tried to stop getting targeted ads on the internet knows, opting out is hard.
Without those protections, consumer advocates fear that broadband providers will be able to do what they like with people's data.
"Advertisers and marketers are lining up to get access to all the information that's now available about us," said Jeff Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy, which advocates for tougher internet privacy measures.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Toomey has accepted $103,500 in campaign donations from Comcast, the Philadelphia-based cable and internet company, between 2011 and 2016. (His Pennsylvania colleague, U.S. Bob Casey, a Democrat, received campaign contributions of $103,775 from the company over the same period.)
A Vocativ analysis found that of the 22 U.S. senators who initially sponsored the resolution, all had regularly received heavy funding from companies and trade groups in the industry. Those 22 alone had received more than $1.7 million from such organizations since 2012 alone, citing Center for Responsive Politics data. Toomey was not an initial sponsor of the Senate resolution.
The House will now take up the issue in the form of Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn's companion joint resolution, sponsored solely by Republicans. If that passes the House, a signature by President Donald Trump would make it law.
Here some of the facts around the issue from the Associated Press:
Of course, Google and Facebook already track you. But proponents of the privacy measure argued that the company that sells you your internet connection can see even more about you: every website you visit, every app that sends or receives data, everyone you email and many that you message. Telecom companies argue that companies like Google know far more about users than they do.
Consumer advocates also point out that it can be hard, in many areas of the country, to dump your cable or phone company for another one if you don't like its practices. Of course, it's also hard to stop using Google or Facebook.
Undoing the Federal Communications Commission's regulation leaves people's online information in a murky area. Today, you can tell a broadband provider not to use your data. Experts say federal law still requires broadband providers to protect customer information — but it doesn't spell out how or what companies must do.
That's what the now endangered rules from the Federal Communications Commission aimed to do. "There's kind of a void," said Perkins Coie telecom attorney Marc Martin.
Cable companies, cellphone carriers and the advertising industry attacked the FCC rules as an overreach. Having to get permission from customers to use their browsing and app histories would likely make it more difficult to build stronger ad businesses, as telecomcompanies want to do.
Internet companies like Google operate under laxer requirements and don't have to ask users' permission before tracking what sites they visit. Republicans and industry groups have blasted that discrepancy, saying it was unfair and confusing for consumers.
If the just-passed measure also clears the House and is signed by President Donald Trump, no future FCC could pass the broadband privacy rules again without further change to U.S. law.
The Trump-appointed chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai, is a critic of the broadband privacy rules and has said he wants to roll them back ≠ along with other Obama-era policies meant to protect consumers and promote competition.
He and other Republicans want a different federal agency, the Federal Trade Commission, to police privacy for both broadband companies like AT&T and internet companies like Google. But broadband providers don't currently fall under FTC jurisdiction, and advocates say the FTC has historically been a weaker agency than the FCC.
"At the FCC, consumers are much more protected with strong privacy rules that give (internet service providers) clear rules as to what's fair and what's foul," Dallas Harris, a policy fellow with consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, said last month. "The FCC is a stronger entity with a bit more teeth to hold ISPs' feet to the fire."
